Skip to content
Institute For Oil & Gas Training
OGI-1331 New

Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course

Duration
5 days
CPD hours
15
Language
English
Next date
02 Nov 2026
View dates & register Download brochure

We use your details only to answer this enquiry. See our privacy policy.

Overview

The Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course by Institute For Oil & Gas Training develops the technical expertise required to evaluate pipeline defects, determine remaining structural capacity and make informed decisions about continued operation, repair, monitoring or replacement. Designed for professionals in the Oil & Gas Pipeline Integrity and Inspection sector, this programme addresses the practical skills gap between identifying pipeline anomalies and translating inspection findings into defensible engineering decisions.

Pipeline operators manage complex networks exposed to corrosion, mechanical damage, manufacturing imperfections, fabrication flaws, environmental stresses and deterioration associated with operating conditions. These challenges require more than defect identification. Engineering teams must understand defect characteristics, assess their severity, establish the effect on pressure containment and determine whether a pipeline remains suitable for its intended service. Effective Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service practices support these decisions through structured technical evaluation, appropriate engineering methods and documented acceptance criteria.

The course focuses on the relationship between pipeline inspection data, defect evaluation, remaining strength assessment and operational risk management. Participants examine how inspection findings from in-line inspection tools, ultrasonic testing, radiographic testing, direct assessment and other inspection techniques inform engineering assessments. They develop an understanding of how defect dimensions, location, orientation, interaction, material properties, wall thickness, operating pressure and loading conditions influence pipeline integrity decisions.

A central component of the programme is corrosion metal loss assessment. Corrosion can reduce the pressure-containing capacity of a pipeline and create uncertainty about its remaining service life. Participants explore methods for characterising metal loss, evaluating corrosion dimensions, distinguishing relevant defect features and interpreting inspection measurements. The programme also addresses the assessment of dents, gouges, cracks, weld-related imperfections and other anomalies, recognising that different defect mechanisms require different assessment approaches.

Fitness-for-service decisions must balance engineering integrity, operational continuity, safety and commercial priorities. An unnecessarily conservative assessment can lead to avoidable intervention costs, while an insufficiently rigorous assessment exposes an organisation to unacceptable operational risks. Institute For Oil & Gas Training equips participants to understand the technical evidence behind assessment decisions, recognise limitations in available data and communicate recommendations that support responsible pipeline management.

The programme also examines the role of recognised engineering standards and assessment frameworks, including ASME B31G, the Modified B31G method, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 where applicable, and relevant pipeline integrity requirements. Participants learn how to distinguish between methods developed for particular defect types and understand why the suitability of an assessment method depends on the pipeline configuration, defect morphology, material characteristics and applicable engineering requirements.

Another important focus is the integration of defect assessment into wider pipeline integrity management. An engineering assessment does not end with a calculation. Its findings must inform repair prioritisation, pressure restrictions, inspection intervals, anomaly tracking, risk registers and maintenance planning. Participants consider how to document assumptions, identify uncertainty, escalate defects requiring specialist analysis and establish traceable recommendations for technical review and operational approval.

Through practical examples and structured exercises, the Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course helps professionals develop a consistent approach to evaluating pipeline condition. It is relevant to organisations operating transmission and distribution pipelines, offshore pipeline systems, gathering networks, processing facilities and associated hydrocarbon infrastructure.

Institute For Oil & Gas Training delivers this programme for professionals who need to strengthen technical judgement, improve the interpretation of inspection results and contribute to reliable engineering decisions. The emphasis remains on practical application, recognised assessment principles and the relationship between defect severity, remaining strength and continued fitness for service.

Objectives

  • Explain the principles of pipeline defect assessment and fitness-for-service within an integrated pipeline integrity management programme.

  • Identify common pipeline defects, including corrosion metal loss, dents, gouges, cracks, manufacturing imperfections and weld-related anomalies.

  • Interpret pipeline inspection reports and determine the engineering information required to assess defect severity.

  • Evaluate the significance of defect dimensions, orientation, location, interaction, wall thickness and material properties.

  • Apply the fundamental principles of remaining strength assessment to corrosion metal loss and other suitable defect categories.

  • Understand the application and limitations of recognised engineering methods, including ASME B31G and the Modified B31G method.

  • Distinguish between assessment approaches for corrosion, mechanical damage, cracking and other relevant defect types.

  • Assess how operating pressure, pressure fluctuations, loading conditions and pipeline service influence defect evaluation.

  • Recognise uncertainty in inspection measurements and identify circumstances requiring additional inspection, specialist analysis or engineering review.

  • Interpret assessment findings to support decisions concerning continued operation, pressure restrictions, repair, replacement and enhanced monitoring.

  • Integrate defect assessment results into pipeline risk management, anomaly management and maintenance planning.

  • Prepare clear technical assessment records that communicate assumptions, findings, limitations and recommended actions.

  • Strengthen coordination between pipeline integrity, inspection, operations, maintenance and engineering teams.

  • Support consistent, evidence-based decisions that improve pipeline reliability, operational efficiency and safety performance.

Training methodology

The Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course uses an industry-oriented delivery approach that connects engineering principles with the operational challenges faced by pipeline operators, inspection contractors, maintenance teams and integrity management departments. Institute For Oil & Gas Training structures the learning experience around practical assessment scenarios, technical discussions, case studies and guided exercises.

Engineering Case Studies

Participants examine representative pipeline integrity scenarios involving corrosion metal loss, localised wall thinning, external mechanical damage, manufacturing imperfections and defects identified during inspection campaigns. Each case study considers the available evidence, the relevant defect characteristics, the assessment method and the operational implications of the resulting engineering decision.

These exercises help participants understand why defect classification must precede method selection. They also demonstrate how differences in defect dimensions, material properties, pressure conditions and data quality influence the interpretation of assessment results.

Inspection Data Interpretation

The programme uses representative inspection records and measurement examples to explain how defect information becomes an engineering assessment. Participants consider in-line inspection reports, ultrasonic thickness measurements, non-destructive testing findings, pipe dimensions and operating records.

The exercises focus on identifying essential data, recognising inconsistencies and determining when further inspection or measurement verification is necessary. Participants learn to distinguish between a reported anomaly and a sufficiently characterised defect that supports an engineering decision.

Guided Assessment Exercises

Structured exercises introduce the principles behind remaining strength assessment, corrosion evaluation and defect acceptance. Participants review the inputs required by recognised assessment methods, follow the logic of the assessment process and interpret the significance of the resulting engineering findings.

Where appropriate, simplified numerical examples illustrate the relationship between measured metal loss, nominal wall thickness, defect dimensions and pressure containment. The exercises develop familiarity with assessment logic without suggesting that simplified calculations replace approved engineering procedures or specialist analysis.

Operational Decision Scenarios

Participants consider realistic situations involving defects discovered during routine inspection, anomalies identified by in-line inspection, uncertain defect dimensions and deterioration requiring further evaluation. They assess the information required to support continued operation, enhanced monitoring, pressure reduction, repair or replacement.

Group discussions explore the consequences of incomplete evidence, conflicting inspection results and competing operational priorities. This approach develops the ability to communicate technical concerns clearly and recommend proportionate actions based on engineering evidence.

Collaborative Technical Review

Group exercises encourage participants to evaluate defects from the perspectives of integrity engineering, inspection, operations, maintenance and safety management. They examine how technical recommendations move through review and approval processes and why consistent documentation supports accountable decisions.

Participants also practise presenting assessment findings in a structured format that identifies the defect, assessment basis, assumptions, limitations, conclusions and recommended actions. This strengthens communication between engineering specialists and operational decision-makers.

Application to Workplace Responsibilities

The training connects assessment principles with practical responsibilities such as anomaly management, integrity reporting, repair planning, inspection prioritisation and the maintenance of technical records. Participants identify opportunities to apply the learning within their existing pipeline integrity procedures.

The delivery approach prioritises sound technical reasoning, appropriate use of recognised standards and clear communication of engineering uncertainty. It prepares participants to contribute more effectively to pipeline defect assessment while respecting the limits of their authority, competence and available evidence.

Organisational impact

Organisations operating hydrocarbon pipeline networks require reliable engineering processes to identify deterioration, evaluate defects and manage the consequences of structural degradation. The Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course supports these requirements by developing personnel capability in the interpretation of inspection data and the application of structured assessment principles.

Improved Pipeline Integrity Decisions

A consistent defect evaluation process helps organisations distinguish between anomalies requiring immediate attention and defects suitable for further assessment or planned intervention. Participants develop a stronger understanding of the evidence needed to justify engineering recommendations.

This capability supports more consistent decisions across pipeline sections, operating regions and inspection programmes. It also improves the quality of technical discussions between inspection contractors, integrity engineers and operational management.

Better Corrosion Management

Corrosion metal loss remains an important consideration in pipeline integrity management. Understanding the relationship between wall thickness reduction, defect geometry and pressure containment helps organisations evaluate corrosion findings more systematically.

Trained personnel can contribute more effectively to corrosion assessment, anomaly ranking, inspection planning and repair prioritisation. This supports the allocation of engineering resources to defects that require the greatest attention based on the applicable assessment criteria and operational context.

More Effective Maintenance Planning

Defect assessment findings provide essential input for maintenance schedules, repair programmes and inspection strategies. A structured assessment process helps organisations establish a technical basis for determining the appropriate response to identified anomalies.

The result is a stronger connection between inspection activities and maintenance decisions. Organisations gain better visibility of outstanding defects, required interventions, assessment limitations and follow-up actions.

Reduced Unnecessary Intervention

Pipeline defects do not all present the same level of concern. Appropriate assessment helps organisations avoid treating every reported anomaly as an identical engineering problem.

When inspection data and recognised methods support a defensible conclusion, organisations can distinguish between defects requiring repair and those that remain acceptable under defined operating conditions. This supports better prioritisation of repair expenditure, contractor resources and operational planning.

Any decision to continue operating a pipeline remains subject to the applicable engineering requirements, assessment limitations and organisational approval procedures.

Stronger Safety and Operational Risk Management

A structured approach to pipeline defect evaluation improves the identification and management of conditions that threaten pressure containment. Participants learn to recognise defects requiring escalation, understand the implications of incomplete evidence and connect engineering findings with operational risk controls.

This contributes to more reliable anomaly management, clearer escalation arrangements and better communication of integrity concerns. It also reinforces the importance of documented engineering judgement when operational decisions affect personnel safety, environmental protection and asset reliability.

Improved Use of Inspection Data

Inspection programmes generate information that must be converted into useful engineering evidence. The course strengthens participants' understanding of data quality, defect characterisation, measurement limitations and the information required for assessment.

Better interpretation helps organisations identify gaps in inspection records, request appropriate follow-up investigations and improve coordination between inspection providers and engineering teams. These practices increase the practical value of inspection expenditure.

More Consistent Technical Documentation

Defect assessments require traceable records of the methods used, assumptions made, data considered and conclusions reached. The course emphasises documentation that supports technical review, management approval and future reassessment.

Consistent records improve knowledge retention, support audit readiness where applicable and help subsequent engineering teams understand the basis of earlier decisions. They also provide a clearer record of outstanding recommendations and the actions required to maintain pipeline integrity.

Stronger Cross-Functional Coordination

Pipeline integrity decisions involve several functions, including engineering, inspection, operations, maintenance, safety and asset management. Different teams need a common understanding of defect severity, assessment limitations and required actions.

By improving the technical vocabulary and assessment awareness of participants, the programme supports clearer communication across these functions. Organisations benefit from more structured discussions, better-defined responsibilities and more effective coordination of integrity-related work.

Support for Continuous Improvement

The course provides a foundation for reviewing existing defect assessment procedures and identifying opportunities to improve them. Organisations can use the learning to strengthen internal guidance, refine assessment workflows, improve anomaly records and identify competency development needs.

Operational benefits should be evaluated against the organisation's own baseline measures, such as assessment turnaround time, overdue anomaly actions, repeat inspection requirements, repair prioritisation and the completeness of engineering records. The course does not guarantee predetermined financial or safety results, but it develops capabilities that support more disciplined performance management.

Personal impact

The Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course strengthens the technical understanding and professional judgement required by personnel involved in pipeline integrity and inspection.

Enhanced Technical Competence

Participants develop a clearer understanding of defect mechanisms, corrosion metal loss, structural capacity and the principles underlying fitness-for-service decisions. They learn how defect characteristics relate to pipeline performance and why assessment methods must match the type and configuration of the identified anomaly.

Greater Confidence in Inspection Interpretation

Professionals gain a more structured approach to reviewing inspection reports and discussing findings with technical specialists. They become better equipped to identify missing information, question uncertain measurements and understand the significance of reported defect dimensions.

This capability is particularly valuable for personnel who coordinate inspection campaigns or review reports without performing every calculation themselves.

Improved Engineering Judgement

Participants strengthen their ability to distinguish between defect identification, defect characterisation and formal engineering assessment. They learn to consider the suitability of an assessment method, recognise its limitations and identify situations requiring additional technical expertise.

This supports more disciplined recommendations and reduces reliance on assumptions that lack sufficient engineering evidence.

Practical Understanding of Remaining Strength

The programme develops familiarity with remaining strength assessment principles and their role in determining the pressure-containing capability of a pipeline with metal loss. Participants understand the relationship between defect geometry, material characteristics and operating conditions.

This knowledge improves their ability to contribute to engineering reviews and communicate the implications of assessment findings.

Better Decision-Making and Communication

Participants learn to present technical findings in a clear and structured manner. They practise explaining assessment assumptions, limitations, recommendations and follow-up requirements to colleagues and management.

These skills support more effective collaboration between technical and non-technical stakeholders, particularly when integrity decisions affect operational continuity, maintenance priorities or expenditure.

Career and Professional Development

The training supports professionals seeking to expand their responsibilities in pipeline inspection, corrosion management, integrity engineering and asset reliability. It provides a broader understanding of the technical considerations involved in pipeline defect management and fitness-for-service evaluation.

Participants can apply the knowledge within their existing roles and use it as a foundation for further development in specialised pipeline integrity assessment.

Stronger Awareness of Professional Responsibility

Fitness-for-service decisions require appropriate competence, reliable evidence and compliance with applicable procedures. Participants develop a stronger appreciation of the importance of technical review, documented assumptions, defined approval responsibilities and timely escalation of significant defects.

The course reinforces responsible engineering practice rather than treating assessment results as automatic authorisation to continue operating a pipeline.

Who should attend

  • Pipeline Integrity Engineers: To strengthen their understanding of defect evaluation, remaining strength assessment and engineering recommendations.

  • Pipeline Inspection Engineers: To improve the interpretation of inspection findings and understand the information required for fitness-for-service assessments.

  • Corrosion Engineers and Corrosion Specialists: To develop practical knowledge of corrosion metal loss evaluation and its implications for pressure containment.

  • Mechanical and Materials Engineers: To understand how defect geometry, material properties and structural behaviour influence pipeline integrity.

  • Pipeline Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Specialists: To consolidate their understanding of recognised assessment methods, applicability and limitations.

  • Non-Destructive Testing Professionals: To understand how inspection results support defect characterisation and subsequent engineering evaluation.

  • In-Line Inspection Engineers and Analysts: To strengthen their ability to interpret reported anomalies and identify data requirements for assessment.

  • Pipeline Maintenance Engineers: To connect assessment findings with repair planning, maintenance prioritisation and intervention decisions.

  • Pipeline Operations Engineers and Supervisors: To understand the engineering basis for operational restrictions, monitoring requirements and defect escalation.

  • Asset Integrity Managers: To improve oversight of defect assessment processes, technical recommendations and integrity management priorities.

  • Risk and Reliability Engineers: To understand how defect assessment findings contribute to pipeline risk evaluation and mitigation planning.

  • Technical Authorities and Engineering Consultants: To strengthen their ability to review assessment assumptions, evaluate technical recommendations and identify the need for specialist analysis.

  • Project Engineers and Pipeline Construction Specialists: To understand the implications of fabrication imperfections, mechanical damage and construction-related defects.

  • Maintenance and Inspection Managers: To improve coordination between inspection programmes, engineering assessments and repair execution.

  • Technical Assurance and Quality Professionals: To strengthen their understanding of traceability, documentation and review requirements for engineering assessments.

Course outline

This module establishes the engineering foundation for Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service. Participants examine common pipeline defect mechanisms, understand how anomalies develop and distinguish between defect identification, characterisation and engineering assessment.

The module explores the relationship between pipeline materials, wall thickness, operating conditions and pressure containment. Participants consider how inspection findings support integrity management and why accurate defect classification is essential before selecting an assessment method.

  1. ASME B31.8

    • Establishes engineering requirements for gas transmission and distribution piping systems within its scope.

    • Provides a recognised framework for pipeline design, materials, construction, inspection and integrity-related considerations.

    • Supports understanding of the relationship between pipeline operating requirements and the engineering evaluation of defects.

    • Addresses responsibilities associated with maintaining the integrity of gas pipeline systems.

    • Must be applied according to the relevant edition, pipeline configuration and applicable jurisdictional requirements.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Identify common pipeline defect categories and their underlying mechanisms.

    • Explain the relationship between defect characteristics and pipeline integrity.

    • Distinguish defect detection from defect characterisation and formal engineering assessment.

    • Identify the information required to support a technically appropriate assessment.

    • Explain how assessment findings contribute to pipeline integrity management.

    • Recognise the importance of selecting assessment methods that match the defect type and pipeline service.

This module focuses on evaluating corrosion metal loss and understanding its effect on pipeline pressure containment. Participants examine how defect depth, length, width, wall thickness and material strength influence the remaining capacity of a pipeline containing corrosion damage.

The module introduces established remaining strength assessment principles and examines when recognised methods are appropriate. Particular attention is given to assessment assumptions, interpretation of results and situations requiring more detailed engineering analysis.

  1. ASME B31G

    • Provides recognised methods for evaluating the remaining strength of corroded pipelines within the method's intended scope.

    • Addresses metal loss assessment using relevant defect measurements and pipeline material and dimensional properties.

    • Establishes a basis for understanding the relationship between corrosion geometry and pressure-carrying capacity.

    • Supports engineering decisions concerning the acceptability of corrosion defects when applicable assessment criteria are satisfied.

    • Requires consideration of method applicability, input quality, assumptions and assessment limitations.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Explain the principal mechanisms and characteristics of corrosion metal loss.

    • Identify the measurements required for remaining strength assessment.

    • Describe the engineering principles underlying ASME B31G and the Modified B31G method.

    • Understand how defect geometry and material properties affect assessment results.

    • Recognise the importance of data quality and method limitations.

    • Interpret corrosion assessment findings to support appropriate engineering review and intervention planning.

This module addresses pipeline defects that require assessment approaches beyond conventional corrosion metal loss methods. Participants examine mechanical damage, dents, gouges, cracking and weld-related imperfections, focusing on the influence of defect geometry, stress concentration, material behaviour and operating conditions.

The module explains why a defect's appearance alone does not establish its acceptability. Participants learn to recognise the need for suitable inspection methods, accurate defect characterisation and specialised engineering evaluation when defects involve cracking, deformation or interacting damage mechanisms.

  1. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1

    • Provides a recognised fitness-for-service framework for evaluating flaws and damage mechanisms within its applicable scope.

    • Addresses different forms of damage and provides assessment procedures for specified conditions and component types.

    • Emphasises the importance of defining the damage mechanism, establishing the required input data and selecting a suitable assessment procedure.

    • Supports the application of fitness-for-service principles while recognising assessment limitations and the need for engineering judgement.

    • Requires careful consideration of applicability because not every procedure is directly suitable for every pipeline defect or component.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Differentiate mechanical damage, corrosion metal loss, cracks and other defect categories.

    • Explain why dents, gouges and crack-like defects require appropriate assessment methods.

    • Identify the information required to characterise mechanical and fracture-related damage.

    • Understand the relevance and limitations of API 579-1/ASME FFS-1.

    • Recognise the significance of interacting defects and combined damage mechanisms.

    • Identify circumstances requiring specialist analysis, additional inspection or formal engineering review.

This module focuses on converting engineering assessment findings into practical operational decisions. Participants examine how defect dimensions, assessment results, operating conditions, acceptance criteria and uncertainty influence decisions about continued service, operating restrictions, repair, replacement or further investigation.

The module also explores the importance of documenting the assessment basis and establishing clear responsibilities for reviewing and approving integrity-related decisions. It reinforces the principle that calculated results must be interpreted within the scope of the selected method and the pipeline's applicable engineering requirements.

  1. ASME B31.4

    • Establishes engineering requirements for liquid hydrocarbon and other applicable liquid pipeline transportation systems within its scope.

    • Provides a recognised framework for understanding pipeline design, operation, maintenance and integrity-related responsibilities.

    • Supports consideration of operating conditions and engineering requirements when evaluating the significance of pipeline defects.

    • Helps distinguish general fitness-for-service principles from requirements applicable to liquid pipeline systems.

    • Must be used alongside applicable pipeline integrity requirements, assessment procedures and jurisdictional obligations.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Explain the relationship between fitness-for-service findings and operational decisions.

    • Identify factors influencing continued operation, pressure restriction, repair and replacement.

    • Understand the relevance of ASME B31.4 to applicable liquid pipeline systems.

    • Recognise the effect of uncertainty and assessment limitations on engineering recommendations.

    • Identify situations requiring additional investigation or specialist technical review.

    • Describe the documentation and approval considerations supporting defensible fitness-for-service decisions.

This module integrates the technical principles covered throughout the course and examines how defect assessment supports an effective pipeline integrity management programme. Participants consider how assessment results influence anomaly prioritisation, inspection planning, maintenance scheduling, risk management and long-term asset reliability.

The module concludes with practical case studies that require participants to review inspection evidence, identify relevant defect characteristics, select an appropriate assessment route and communicate recommendations. The emphasis is on traceable engineering reasoning, appropriate use of standards and clear identification of the actions needed to manage pipeline integrity.

  1. API 1160

    • Provides a recognised framework for managing the integrity of hazardous liquid pipelines.

    • Addresses the systematic identification, assessment and management of pipeline integrity threats within its scope.

    • Supports the integration of assessment findings with integrity planning, mitigation and ongoing programme evaluation.

    • Demonstrates how defect assessment contributes to a broader, risk-informed integrity management process.

    • Applies to the relevant hazardous liquid pipeline context and must be considered alongside other applicable requirements.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Explain how defect assessment supports pipeline integrity management.

    • Relate assessment findings to anomaly prioritisation, risk management and maintenance planning.

    • Identify the principal elements of a traceable defect assessment report.

    • Understand the relevance of API 1160 to applicable hazardous liquid pipeline integrity programmes.

    • Develop structured recommendations based on inspection evidence and recognised assessment principles.

    • Identify opportunities to improve defect management procedures, reporting quality and cross-functional coordination.

Certificate

Upon successful completion of the Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course, attendees receive a Certificate of Completion from Institute For Oil & Gas Training.

The certificate recognises participation in the programme and completion of its learning requirements. Attendees must meet the course attendance requirement set by Institute For Oil & Gas Training to receive the certificate. Where applicable, participants must also complete the required learning activities in accordance with the programme's delivery arrangements.

Course dates

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £4,300

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £4,300

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £4,300

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £4,300

Fees include tuition, course materials and refreshments. Need different dates or a different city? Ask about your preferred date.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Pipeline Defect Assessment and Fitness-for-Service Training Course?

The course develops practical understanding of pipeline defect evaluation, corrosion metal loss, remaining strength assessment and fitness-for-service decision-making. It helps oil and gas professionals interpret inspection findings, understand recognised assessment methods and contribute to decisions concerning continued operation, repair, monitoring and replacement.

Who should attend this pipeline integrity training course?

The course is designed for pipeline integrity engineers, inspection engineers, corrosion specialists, mechanical engineers, non-destructive testing professionals, maintenance personnel, operations supervisors, asset integrity managers and technical consultants. It is particularly relevant to professionals responsible for evaluating pipeline defects or managing the engineering actions arising from inspection findings.

Which standards and assessment methods does the course cover?

The programme introduces ASME B31G and the Modified B31G method for appropriate corrosion metal loss assessments. It also examines API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 fitness-for-service principles, ASME B31.4 for applicable liquid pipeline systems, ASME B31.8 for gas pipeline systems and API 1160 for hazardous liquid pipeline integrity management. The relevance of each standard depends on the pipeline type, defect characteristics, applicable edition and governing requirements.

How does the course help professionals assess pipeline defects?

Participants learn to interpret inspection data, identify relevant defect characteristics, understand remaining strength assessment principles and recognise the limitations of different assessment methods. Practical case studies help them understand how assessment findings inform engineering recommendations, additional inspection, operating restrictions, repair planning and integrity management.

What certificate will attendees receive, and how long is the course?

Attendees who meet the attendance requirement receive a Certificate of Completion from Institute For Oil & Gas Training. The total course duration is 15 to 20 hours, depending on the delivery arrangement. The programme focuses on practical defect evaluation, recognised engineering standards and the application of fitness-for-service principles to pipeline integrity decisions.

Next: 02 Nov 2026

4 dates available

Register Now

Related training courses

Get the training calendar in your inbox

New courses, dates and industry insight. No more than twice a month.