Skip to content
Institute For Oil & Gas Training
OGI-1245 New

API RP 1188 Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities Integrity Training Course

Duration
5 days
CPD hours
15
Language
English
Next date
19 Oct 2026
View dates & register Download brochure

We use your details only to answer this enquiry. See our privacy policy.

Overview

The API RP 1188 Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities Integrity Training Course from Institute For Oil & Gas Training develops the operational knowledge and technical capabilities required to assess, maintain and improve the integrity of hazardous liquid pipeline facilities across the oil and gas sector. Built around API RP 1188 and its relevance to pipeline facility integrity, the course focuses on inspection practices, risk-based decision-making, asset condition assessment and the management of operational threats affecting facilities that transport hazardous liquids.

Hazardous liquid pipelines form a critical part of the energy supply chain, connecting production facilities, storage terminals, refineries, processing plants and distribution networks. Their safe and reliable operation depends on more than the condition of the pipeline itself. Valves, pumps, manifolds, piping assemblies, metering equipment, pressure control systems and associated facility components also require systematic inspection, maintenance and integrity oversight. Deficiencies in these areas increase the potential for product releases, equipment failures, service interruptions, environmental damage and significant commercial losses.

Organisations responsible for hazardous liquid pipelines face a complex integrity management challenge. Ageing assets, changing operating conditions, corrosion, mechanical damage, inadequate maintenance records and inconsistent inspection practices create uncertainty about asset condition and remaining serviceability. Facilities also experience operational changes, including equipment modifications, increased throughput, product changes and revised operating pressures. Each change requires appropriate technical review to establish its implications for pipeline facility integrity and continued safe operation.

The API RP 1188 Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities Integrity Training Course addresses these challenges by developing a structured approach to identifying threats, evaluating inspection findings, prioritising corrective actions and maintaining reliable integrity records. Participants examine how inspection programmes, engineering assessments, maintenance strategies and operational controls work together to reduce the likelihood of facility failures. The course also develops an understanding of how pipeline risk management supports the allocation of resources towards equipment and conditions presenting the greatest operational concern.

A central focus is the relationship between liquid pipeline inspection and practical integrity decisions. Inspection data has limited value when organisations cannot interpret findings, assess their significance or translate them into corrective measures. Participants develop the ability to distinguish routine maintenance issues from conditions requiring engineering assessment, operational restrictions or urgent intervention. They also examine the importance of traceable records, consistent defect classification and clear communication between operations, maintenance, inspection and engineering teams.

The course places API RP 1188 within the wider context of pipeline facility integrity management and applicable industry standards. It distinguishes the specific scope of a recommended practice from the requirements established by other applicable standards, regulations and company procedures. This distinction helps participants select appropriate technical references without treating every industry document as a universal legal requirement.

Delivered by Institute For Oil & Gas Training, the programme is designed for professionals who need to strengthen integrity assurance across hazardous liquid pipeline facilities. It connects technical inspection principles with operational accountability, risk evaluation and maintenance planning. Participants gain a practical framework for supporting informed decisions, improving defect management and strengthening coordination across teams responsible for asset performance.

Objectives

  • Explain the purpose and application of API RP 1188 within the wider context of hazardous liquid pipeline facilities integrity.

  • Identify the principal equipment and facility components requiring structured integrity oversight.

  • Recognise common threats affecting pipeline facilities, including corrosion, mechanical damage, leakage, equipment deterioration and operational deviations.

  • Develop an understanding of inspection planning, inspection coverage and the selection of suitable inspection methods.

  • Interpret inspection reports and equipment condition records to identify integrity concerns and information gaps.

  • Apply structured risk assessment principles to prioritise inspection findings and corrective actions.

  • Evaluate the operational significance of identified defects and recognise when specialist engineering assessment is required.

  • Distinguish recognised industry standards, regulatory obligations, engineering codes and internal operating procedures.

  • Understand how maintenance planning and defect management contribute to long-term asset integrity.

  • Improve the quality, consistency and traceability of inspection and maintenance documentation.

  • Strengthen communication between inspection, engineering, operations, maintenance and asset management teams.

  • Develop practical recommendations for improving integrity assurance, operational reliability and risk control across hazardous liquid pipeline facilities.

Training methodology

The API RP 1188 Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities Integrity Training Course uses an applied, industry-focused methodology that connects technical principles with the operational demands of pipeline facilities. Institute For Oil & Gas Training structures the learning experience around practical interpretation, guided analysis and realistic decision-making rather than theoretical discussion alone.

Instructor-Led Technical Sessions

Specialist-led sessions introduce the principles of pipeline facility integrity, inspection planning, equipment condition assessment and threat identification. Participants examine the relationship between operating conditions, equipment degradation, inspection evidence and integrity decisions. Discussions connect technical concepts with the responsibilities of operations, maintenance, inspection and engineering personnel.

The sessions also explore the role of recognised industry standards in establishing consistent technical practices. Participants learn to distinguish between recommended practices, regulatory obligations, engineering codes and internal procedures, helping them apply the correct reference to each integrity management decision.

Case Studies and Operational Scenarios

Industry-based case studies examine representative integrity challenges involving corrosion, leakage, deteriorating equipment, defective valves, inadequate inspection coverage and incomplete maintenance documentation. Participants review the available evidence, identify potential consequences and determine the additional information required before selecting a corrective action.

Scenario analysis encourages participants to consider operational context alongside technical findings. For example, a defect assessment must account for equipment function, product characteristics, operating conditions, failure consequences and the effectiveness of existing safeguards. This approach reinforces the importance of evidence-based decisions rather than relying on isolated inspection observations.

Inspection Report Interpretation

Participants work through illustrative inspection reports, equipment condition records, defect descriptions and maintenance histories. The exercises focus on identifying relevant findings, recognising missing information, evaluating the quality of supporting evidence and establishing appropriate follow-up actions.

The methodology reinforces clear documentation and consistent communication. Participants practise converting inspection findings into actionable recommendations that maintenance planners, engineers, supervisors and asset managers can understand and implement.

Risk Assessment Workshops

Guided workshops introduce practical methods for identifying integrity threats and ranking concerns according to their likelihood, consequences and available evidence. Participants consider corrosion, mechanical damage, equipment deterioration, operational deviations and weaknesses in maintenance controls.

The exercises demonstrate how pipeline risk management supports inspection prioritisation and maintenance planning. Participants also examine the limitations of incomplete data, uncertain defect measurements and assumptions that have not been validated through appropriate technical assessment.

Group Exercises and Technical Discussions

Group exercises bring together different operational perspectives. Participants examine how inspection personnel, engineers, maintenance teams and operations supervisors contribute to integrity decisions. They discuss escalation criteria, corrective action ownership, reporting responsibilities and the communication of urgent findings.

These activities strengthen cross-functional coordination and encourage consistent decision-making across departments. Participants also compare approaches to inspection scheduling, defect tracking, maintenance prioritisation and integrity performance monitoring.

Practical Action Planning

The programme concludes with structured action planning. Participants identify opportunities to improve inspection records, strengthen equipment monitoring, clarify responsibilities and establish more effective follow-up processes. Each action is linked to a defined operational need and an appropriate method of tracking progress.

This practical approach helps participants translate the course content into workplace improvements. Institute For Oil & Gas Training emphasises realistic recommendations that reflect the organisation's asset portfolio, operating environment, established procedures and applicable technical requirements.

Organisational impact

Organisations investing in the API RP 1188 Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities Integrity Training Course gain a stronger foundation for managing asset condition, inspection findings and operational risks. The benefits arise from better-informed decisions, more consistent work processes and clearer accountability across functions responsible for hazardous liquid pipeline facilities.

Improved Asset Integrity Oversight

A structured approach to pipeline facility integrity helps organisations establish clearer expectations for equipment inspection, defect assessment and corrective action management. Participants develop an improved understanding of the relationship between asset condition, operational exposure and maintenance requirements.

Organisations can use this capability to strengthen integrity registers, improve equipment histories and establish more consistent approaches to tracking outstanding defects. These improvements support more transparent asset management and provide decision-makers with better information when reviewing facility condition.

More Effective Inspection Planning

Inspection resources are most effective when directed towards credible threats and equipment with significant operational consequences. The course strengthens participants' understanding of inspection scope, equipment criticality, degradation mechanisms and risk-informed inspection priorities.

Organisations can apply these principles when reviewing inspection schedules, identifying coverage gaps and determining where additional examination or engineering assessment is justified. Better planning supports more purposeful use of inspection personnel, specialist services and maintenance resources.

Stronger Operational Risk Management

Hazardous liquid releases create potential consequences for personnel, the environment, nearby communities, business continuity and company reputation. The course improves awareness of conditions that contribute to facility failures and reinforces the importance of timely defect escalation and appropriate operational controls.

Participants develop a more consistent approach to evaluating risk information and identifying actions that address credible threats. Organisations can incorporate these practices into established risk management processes, subject to their own procedures and applicable requirements.

Better Maintenance Prioritisation

Maintenance teams frequently manage competing demands across multiple assets and operational areas. A clearer understanding of integrity findings helps personnel distinguish between routine maintenance needs, defects requiring planned intervention and conditions demanding urgent attention.

This capability supports more transparent maintenance backlogs, improved work prioritisation and clearer communication between technical and operational teams. It also helps organisations evaluate whether corrective actions address the underlying degradation mechanism rather than only the visible symptom.

Improved Compliance and Audit Readiness

Pipeline operators must understand and meet the regulatory and technical requirements applicable to their facilities and jurisdictions. The course reinforces the importance of identifying relevant requirements, maintaining appropriate records and documenting the rationale behind integrity decisions.

Organisations can use the resulting knowledge to review internal procedures, improve the traceability of inspection findings and prepare more complete evidence for internal reviews and applicable audits. The course supports compliance awareness but does not replace jurisdiction-specific legal advice or specialist regulatory assessments.

Reduced Exposure to Unplanned Disruption

Equipment failures and unexpected product releases can interrupt operations, create emergency maintenance demands and affect customer commitments. Stronger inspection interpretation, defect escalation and corrective action management support earlier recognition of integrity concerns.

By improving the quality of decisions surrounding facility condition, organisations strengthen their ability to plan interventions and manage operational exposure. Actual improvements in failure rates, downtime and maintenance expenditure depend on implementation quality, asset conditions and the effectiveness of the wider integrity management system.

More Consistent Cross-Functional Decisions

Integrity management depends on effective cooperation between departments with different responsibilities and technical perspectives. The course provides a common framework for discussing defects, assessing consequences, assigning responsibilities and documenting decisions.

This shared understanding helps reduce ambiguity between inspection findings and maintenance action. It also supports clearer reporting to supervisors and managers responsible for approving interventions, allocating budgets and overseeing facility performance.

Stronger Performance Monitoring

Organisations require meaningful indicators to determine whether integrity processes are operating effectively. Course participants examine how inspection completion, overdue corrective actions, defect closure, record quality and repeat findings can inform management reviews.

These indicators help establish a practical basis for monitoring improvement. When organisations define clear ownership, reliable data sources and suitable review intervals, they strengthen accountability and improve visibility of emerging integrity concerns.

Personal impact

The course develops technical awareness and practical decision-making skills for professionals involved in hazardous liquid pipeline facilities. Participants gain a broader understanding of how inspection evidence, engineering judgement, operational controls and maintenance decisions contribute to reliable asset performance.

Enhanced Technical Understanding

Participants strengthen their understanding of pipeline facility components, common degradation mechanisms and the principles used to evaluate asset condition. They learn how defects develop, why inspection findings require appropriate interpretation and how equipment condition affects operational reliability.

This broader perspective helps professionals recognise the relationship between individual equipment issues and the integrity of the wider facility.

Improved Inspection Interpretation

Participants develop greater confidence in reviewing inspection reports, identifying information gaps and recognising findings that require further investigation. They learn to ask relevant technical questions and distinguish documented evidence from assumptions that require validation.

These skills support more effective communication with inspection contractors, maintenance teams and engineering specialists.

Stronger Risk-Based Decision-Making

The programme develops the ability to consider likelihood, consequences, asset criticality and uncertainty when reviewing integrity concerns. Participants gain a structured approach to prioritising findings and identifying suitable next steps.

This capability supports better judgement when evaluating competing maintenance demands, reviewing inspection recommendations and escalating significant defects.

Better Communication and Reporting

Clear integrity reporting helps technical findings translate into effective action. Participants strengthen their ability to explain defects, document recommendations, identify responsible parties and communicate the operational significance of unresolved issues.

These capabilities are valuable for professionals coordinating inspection activities, managing maintenance work or presenting asset condition information to senior management.

Greater Career Versatility

Knowledge of pipeline facility integrity supports professional development across inspection, maintenance, engineering, operations and asset management functions. Participants gain a broader perspective on the responsibilities and decisions that connect these disciplines.

The course also helps professionals engage more effectively in integrity reviews, maintenance planning meetings, inspection programme assessments and operational risk discussions. The Certificate of Completion provides evidence of participation in the training programme, rather than a professional licence or external certification.

Who should attend

  • Pipeline Integrity Engineers responsible for assessing asset condition, identifying integrity threats and supporting pipeline facility integrity management.

  • Pipeline Inspection Engineers and Inspectors involved in inspection planning, evaluating inspection findings and recommending corrective actions.

  • Asset Integrity Managers overseeing integrity programmes, equipment condition monitoring and long-term asset reliability.

  • Maintenance Engineers and Maintenance Managers responsible for planning repairs, prioritising maintenance activities and managing equipment defects.

  • Pipeline Operations Managers and Supervisors overseeing hazardous liquid pipeline operations, operational controls and equipment performance.

  • Mechanical Engineers responsible for pressure-containing equipment, piping systems, valves, pumps and associated facility components.

  • Corrosion Engineers and Corrosion Specialists involved in identifying degradation mechanisms, evaluating corrosion risks and developing mitigation strategies.

  • Reliability Engineers responsible for improving equipment availability, analysing failures and reducing unplanned operational disruptions.

  • Risk Management Professionals involved in pipeline risk assessment, threat evaluation and the prioritisation of integrity-related interventions.

  • Quality Assurance and Quality Control Personnel responsible for verifying inspection records, reviewing technical documentation and supporting the quality of maintenance and repair activities.

  • Health, Safety and Environmental Professionals involved in evaluating operational hazards, managing potential liquid releases and supporting environmental risk controls.

  • Technical and Engineering Managers responsible for engineering assurance, technical standards, maintenance performance and integrity-related decision-making.

  • Compliance and Audit Professionals responsible for reviewing integrity management documentation, assessing procedural compliance and preparing evidence for internal or external audits.

  • Pipeline Project Engineers and Project Managers involved in facility modifications, equipment upgrades and changes that affect pipeline integrity.

  • Oil and Gas Asset Managers and Department Heads seeking to strengthen integrity governance, optimise maintenance priorities and improve operational reliability across pipeline facilities.

Course outline

This module establishes the foundations of hazardous liquid pipeline facilities integrity and explains how facility-level asset management contributes to safe and reliable operations. Participants examine the relationship between pipeline systems and associated facilities, including pumps, valves, manifolds, piping assemblies, pressure control equipment and metering installations.

The module also explores the responsibilities involved in maintaining facility integrity throughout the asset lifecycle. Participants consider equipment criticality, operating conditions, degradation mechanisms and the importance of accurate asset information. The emphasis is on understanding how integrity activities fit within an organisation's wider operating and risk management arrangements.

  1. API RP 1188

    • Introduces API RP 1188 as the course's central reference and examines its intended scope in relation to hazardous liquid pipeline facilities integrity.

    • Develops an understanding of how applicable recommended practices support consistent technical decision-making and integrity oversight.

    • Examines the importance of establishing clear responsibilities for inspection, condition assessment, defect management and recordkeeping.

    • Reinforces the need to verify the current edition, official title, scope and applicability of the referenced recommended practice before incorporating it into company procedures.

    • Distinguishes industry guidance from binding regulatory requirements and organisation-specific operating standards.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Explain the principal concepts underlying hazardous liquid pipeline facilities integrity management.

    • Identify facility components that require appropriate inspection and condition monitoring.

    • Describe the relationship between equipment criticality, operating conditions and integrity priorities.

    • Explain how asset registers and equipment histories support integrity decisions.

    • Recognise the importance of assigning responsibilities for inspection, maintenance and corrective action.

    • Identify opportunities to improve consistency across facility integrity processes.

Effective liquid pipeline inspection depends on selecting suitable examination methods, defining inspection coverage and interpreting results within the operating context. This module examines the preparation and execution of facility inspection activities, with particular attention to equipment condition, degradation mechanisms and the quality of inspection evidence.

Participants explore visual examination, corrosion assessment, non-destructive examination where appropriate, equipment condition checks and the review of maintenance histories. The module also considers inspection limitations, access constraints and the need for qualified personnel to determine the appropriate examination techniques for specific equipment and service conditions.

  1. API 570

    • Introduces the API Piping Inspection Code as a recognised reference for inspection, rating, repair and alteration of in-service piping systems within its defined scope.

    • Examines the importance of evaluating piping condition, corrosion mechanisms and inspection findings.

    • Explains how inspection recommendations relate to piping integrity decisions and the need for appropriate engineering review.

    • Highlights the importance of distinguishing the scope of API 570 from requirements applicable to other facility equipment and pipeline systems.

    • Reinforces the need to confirm applicability against the equipment type, governing code, jurisdiction and current edition.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Identify the principal stages involved in planning a facility inspection programme.

    • Recognise inspection methods relevant to common equipment and piping conditions.

    • Evaluate the importance of inspection coverage, accessibility and equipment operating history.

    • Interpret inspection observations and identify missing or inconsistent information.

    • Explain when findings require additional examination or specialist engineering assessment.

    • Support the preparation of clear inspection recommendations and follow-up actions.

    • Recognise the limitations of inspection techniques and the importance of competent personnel.

This module examines how integrity threats develop and how organisations evaluate their potential consequences. Participants consider corrosion, mechanical damage, leakage, deterioration of pressure-containing equipment, valve failures, operational deviations and deficiencies in maintenance practices. The module emphasises the relationship between credible threats, facility configuration, product characteristics and the consequences of equipment failure.

Participants also explore how pipeline risk management supports inspection prioritisation, maintenance planning and the escalation of significant defects. Practical exercises examine risk-ranking principles, the quality of supporting evidence and the need to reassess priorities when operating conditions or asset information change.

  1. API RP 580

    • Introduces the principles of risk-based inspection and the relationship between equipment failure likelihood and consequences.

    • Examines how degradation mechanisms and inspection findings inform risk assessments.

    • Explains how risk-ranking methods support inspection planning and the prioritisation of assessment activities.

    • Highlights the importance of data quality, documented assumptions and consistent evaluation criteria.

    • Clarifies that risk-based inspection methods must be applied within their intended scope and do not replace applicable pipeline-specific requirements.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Identify common integrity threats affecting hazardous liquid pipeline facilities.

    • Explain how degradation mechanisms influence equipment condition and failure potential.

    • Apply structured principles to rank integrity concerns according to risk.

    • Recognise how operating conditions and product characteristics affect consequence assessments.

    • Identify data gaps and uncertainties that influence risk evaluation.

    • Support the prioritisation of inspection and corrective maintenance activities.

    • Explain when changes in operating conditions or inspection findings justify reassessment.

    • Communicate risk findings and recommendations to relevant technical and operational personnel.

Inspection findings require timely evaluation and effective follow-through. This module focuses on the process of converting observed defects into documented decisions and completed corrective actions. Participants examine defect classification, engineering assessment, repair planning, maintenance prioritisation and the escalation of conditions that threaten safe or reliable operation.

The module also addresses the importance of understanding defect significance before determining a response. Participants explore the relationship between defect characteristics, equipment function, operating conditions and potential consequences. Particular attention is given to traceable decisions, repair verification, action ownership and the review of recurring defects.

  1. ASME B31.4

    • Introduces the standard covering pipeline transportation systems for liquids and slurries within its defined scope.

    • Examines the relevance of design, construction, operation, maintenance and integrity considerations to applicable liquid pipeline systems.

    • Explains the importance of applying appropriate engineering requirements when evaluating defects and planning repairs.

    • Reinforces the need to identify the governing code and applicable edition for the particular pipeline or facility.

    • Clarifies that the standard's applicability depends on system boundaries, service conditions and other governing requirements.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Explain the principal stages of defect evaluation and corrective action management.

    • Identify conditions that require further engineering review or escalation.

    • Distinguish routine maintenance findings from defects with potentially significant operational consequences.

    • Support the prioritisation of repairs using documented technical evidence and risk considerations.

    • Explain the importance of repair procedures, verification and appropriate return-to-service controls.

    • Establish clear ownership and follow-up arrangements for outstanding integrity actions.

    • Recognise recurring defects and identify the need to investigate underlying causes.

    • Improve the traceability of decisions relating to equipment condition and corrective maintenance.

The final module integrates the technical and management principles covered throughout the programme. Participants examine how inspection records, risk assessments, maintenance histories and corrective action registers contribute to a reliable integrity management process. The focus is on establishing consistent controls, reviewing performance and maintaining an accurate record of decisions affecting hazardous liquid pipeline facilities.

Participants also explore integrity performance indicators, audit preparation, management reviews and the use of lessons learned to improve operating practices. The module considers how organisations maintain alignment between technical standards, regulatory obligations, internal procedures and changing asset conditions.

  1. API RP 1173

    • Introduces the Pipeline Safety Management Systems recommended practice and its systems-based approach to pipeline safety.

    • Examines leadership, risk management, operational controls, assurance and continual improvement as elements of an effective safety management system.

    • Explains how incident learning, performance monitoring and management review contribute to stronger safety practices.

    • Highlights the value of defined responsibilities, documented processes and systematic evaluation of performance.

    • Reinforces the need to apply the recommended practice in accordance with its scope and the organisation's relevant operating context.

    Learning Outcomes

    • Explain how documentation supports pipeline facility integrity assurance.

    • Identify records required to support inspection findings, risk assessments and maintenance decisions.

    • Develop a structured approach to tracking defects and outstanding corrective actions.

    • Identify practical indicators for monitoring inspection and integrity management performance.

    • Explain the role of internal reviews and audits in identifying weaknesses in integrity processes.

    • Apply lessons learned to improve inspection planning and maintenance controls.

    • Recognise the importance of management accountability and continual improvement.

    • Develop practical recommendations for strengthening integrity assurance within their organisation.

Certificate

Upon successful completion of the API RP 1188 Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities Integrity Training Course, participants receive a Certificate of Completion from Institute For Oil & Gas Training, subject to meeting the institute's attendance requirements.

Course dates

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £3,900

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £3,900

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £3,900

  • Europe

    Middle East

    Asia

    Africa

    North America

    Online

    Fee: £3,900

Fees include tuition, course materials and refreshments. Need different dates or a different city? Ask about your preferred date.

Frequently asked questions

What is the API RP 1188 Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities Integrity Training Course about?

The course focuses on the inspection, assessment and management of integrity risks affecting hazardous liquid pipeline facilities. It covers equipment condition monitoring, threat identification, inspection planning, risk assessment, defect management, maintenance prioritisation and integrity documentation. Participants develop practical knowledge for supporting safer operations and more consistent integrity decisions across pipeline facilities.

Who should attend this training course?

The course is suitable for pipeline integrity engineers, inspection specialists, maintenance engineers, operations supervisors, asset integrity managers, reliability professionals, technical managers and personnel responsible for pipeline facility risk management. It also benefits professionals involved in maintenance planning, engineering assurance, operational safety and compliance monitoring.

How is the course delivered?

Institute For Oil & Gas Training delivers the course through instructor-led technical sessions, practical case studies, inspection report exercises, risk assessment workshops and operational scenarios. Group discussions and action-planning activities help participants connect industry principles with workplace responsibilities and identify opportunities to improve their organisation's integrity management practices.

Which standards are covered during the course?

The programme examines API RP 1188 as its central reference and considers related standards, including API 570, API RP 580, ASME B31.4 and API RP 1173. These references address relevant aspects of piping inspection, risk-based inspection, liquid pipeline systems and pipeline safety management. Their applicability depends on the equipment, system boundaries, jurisdiction and governing requirements.

Will participants receive a certificate upon completion?

Yes. Participants who successfully complete the course receive a Certificate of Completion from Institute For Oil & Gas Training. The certificate recognises completion of the training programme. Participants must satisfy the institute's applicable attendance requirement to qualify for the certificate. The certificate does not constitute a professional licence or an external API certification.

Next: 19 Oct 2026

4 dates available

Register Now

Related training courses

Get the training calendar in your inbox

New courses, dates and industry insight. No more than twice a month.